* Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ingo: > > I noticed that local_bh_disable is now always out-of-line. The change > was made when TRACE_IRQFLAGS was added. However, with TRACE_IRQFLAGS > off, local_bh_disable does exactly the same work as before. In > particular, it does pretty much the same as what preempt_disable does > and the latter is always inline. > > So I'm wondering if it would be reasonable to make it out-of-line when > TRACE_IRQFLAGS is off. This may make a difference because the > networking stack is a frequent user of local_bh_disable and > local_bh_enable.
do you mean to make it inline again? (btw., generally i think local_bh_disable() is a poor API because it is opaque about the data structure dependency that it governs. Explicit exclusion rules generally work better.) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html