From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:56:14 +0300
> The _find calls calculate the hash value using the > xfrm_state_hmask, without the xfrm_state_lock. But the > value of this mask can change in the _resize call under > the state_lock, so we risk to fail in finding the desired > entry in hash. > > I think, that the hash value is better to calculate > under the state lock. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for the bug fix. I know why I coded it this way, I wanted to give GCC more room to schedule the loads away from the uses in the hash calculation. Once you cram it after the spin lock acquire, it can't load unrelated values earlier to soften the load/use cost on cache misses. Of course it's invalid because the hash mask can change as you noticed. I wish there was a way to conditionally clobber memory, then we could tell GCC exactly what memory objects are protected by the lock and thus help in situations like this so much. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
