On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:27 +0100 (CET) Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [<783bfa72>] rt_run_flush+0x43/0x8b > >> [<783bfa93>] rt_run_flush+0x64/0x8b > >> [<7813ac54>] notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x52 > >> [<7813ac9e>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x17/0x1a > >> [<783a3471>] netdev_state_change+0x18/0x29 > >> [<783ac6a9>] __linkwatch_run_queue+0x150/0x17e > >> [<783ac6f4>] linkwatch_event+0x1d/0x22 > >> [<78133cdf>] run_workqueue+0xdb/0x1b6 > >> [<78133c8b>] run_workqueue+0x87/0x1b6 > >> [<783ac6d7>] linkwatch_event+0x0/0x22 > >> [<781346ff>] worker_thread+0x0/0x85 > >> [<78134778>] worker_thread+0x79/0x85 > >> [<781371ad>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35 > >> [<781370f6>] kthread+0x38/0x5e > >> [<781370be>] kthread+0x0/0x5e > >> [<78104baf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > >> ======================= > >> RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1610) > > > > > > Hopefully this is due to the bug you reported in bug #9542. > > > > Does this patch fix both issues? > > Unfortunately not. I just updated bugzilla. argh. Please conduct these discussions via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface. I think my patch _did_ fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9542 But then you hit a new bonding locking bug. Rafael, please track 9542 and 9543 as post-2.6.23 regressions, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
