There's no need in having this function exist in a form
of macro. Properly formatted function looks much better.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 3b9c430..6714bbc 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -235,16 +235,25 @@ struct rt_hash_bucket {
static spinlock_t *rt_hash_locks;
# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) &rt_hash_locks[(slot) & (RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ - 1)]
-# define rt_hash_lock_init() { \
- int i; \
- rt_hash_locks = kmalloc(sizeof(spinlock_t) * RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ,
GFP_KERNEL); \
- if (!rt_hash_locks) panic("IP: failed to allocate
rt_hash_locks\n"); \
- for (i = 0; i < RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ; i++) \
- spin_lock_init(&rt_hash_locks[i]); \
- }
+
+static __init void rt_hash_lock_init(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ rt_hash_locks = kmalloc(sizeof(spinlock_t) * RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rt_hash_locks)
+ panic("IP: failed to allocate rt_hash_locks\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ; i++)
+ spin_lock_init(&rt_hash_locks[i]);
+}
#else
# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) NULL
-# define rt_hash_lock_init()
+
+static inline void rt_hash_lock_init(void)
+{
+}
#endif
static struct rt_hash_bucket *rt_hash_table;
--
1.5.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
