On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:12:00PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:51:32 +1100 > > > Does anybody actually need the 0 setting? What would we break if > > the default became 1? > > I bet there are UDP apps out there that would break if we > didn't do this.
Right. This is definitely bad for protocols without a retransmission mechanism. However, is the 0 setting ever useful for TCP and in particular, TCP's connect(2) call? Perhaps we can just make that one always drop. Well, until someone implements queueing to fix all of this properly that is :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
