On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:48:08AM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >
> > This work was mostly done by David S. Miller.
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -253,6 +254,8 @@ struct sk_buff {
> > struct sk_buff *next;
> > struct sk_buff *prev;
> >
> > + struct rb_node rb;
>
> Did David really do this? :)
...Believe it or not, yes he did :-), and there's even a more convicing
proof about that in here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117269223013422&w=2
...and in Dave's obsolete tcp-2.6 tree (which has the bug fixed
version)... ;-)
...I changed it by just by moving tp->write_queue_rb = RB_ROOT to another
function because I needed more initialization later on.
> I suppose if we moved this into cb (by growing it by the required amount)
> then at least the new space can be used by others.
...yeah, will do.
--
i.
