YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:31:27 -0500), Chuck Lever 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

                   clp->rpc_ops->version,
-                  NIPQUAD(clp->cl_addr.sin_addr),
-                  ntohs(clp->cl_addr.sin_port),
+                  rpc_peeraddr2str(clp->cl_rpcclient, RPC_DISPLAY_HEX_ADDR),
+                  rpc_peeraddr2str(clp->cl_rpcclient, RPC_DISPLAY_HEX_PORT),
                   atomic_read(&clp->cl_count),

Is this really safe?

What's unsafe about it? rpc_peeraddr2str() is designed to be called this way.
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to