Hi Fred First, are you breaking up the functionality into multiple patches _only_ to ease review and plan to submit the final version as a big patch?
The reason I ask, is that you Patch 02, which adds Kconfig pieces could break compilations if the functionality is enabled. Templin, Fred L wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: osprey67 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 7:54 AM > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH 01/05] ipv6: RFC4214 Support (4) > > From: Fred L. Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This is experimental support for the Intra-Site Automatic > Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) per RFC4214. It uses > the SIT module, and is configured using the unmodified > "ip" utility with device names beginning with: "isatap". > > The following diffs are specific to the Linux 2.6.24-rc2 > kernel distribution. > > Signed-off-by: Fred L. Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/if.h.orig 2007-11-08 > 12:05:47.000000000 -0800 > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/if.h 2007-11-08 08:26:44.000000000 > -0800 > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ > #define IFF_MASTER_ALB 0x10 /* bonding master, balance-alb. > */ > #define IFF_BONDING 0x20 /* bonding master or slave > */ > #define IFF_SLAVE_NEEDARP 0x40 /* need ARPs for validation > */ > +#define IFF_ISATAP 0x80 /* ISATAP interface (RFC4214) > */ > > #define IF_GET_IFACE 0x0001 /* for querying only */ > #define IF_GET_PROTO 0x0002 > --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/in.h.orig 2007-11-09 > 08:00:32.000000000 -0800 > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/linux/in.h 2007-11-12 07:37:05.000000000 > -0800 > @@ -253,6 +253,14 @@ struct sockaddr_in { > #define ZERONET(x) (((x) & htonl(0xff000000)) == > htonl(0x00000000)) > #define LOCAL_MCAST(x) (((x) & htonl(0xFFFFFF00)) == > htonl(0xE0000000)) > > +/* Special-Use IPv4 Addresses (RFC3330) */ > +#define PRIVATE_10(x) (((x) & htonl(0xff000000)) == htonl(0x0A000000)) > +#define LINKLOCAL_169(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffff0000)) == > htonl(0xA9FE0000)) > +#define PRIVATE_172(x) (((x) & htonl(0xfff00000)) == htonl(0xAC100000)) > +#define TEST_192(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffffff00)) == htonl(0xC0000200)) > +#define ANYCAST_6TO4(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffffff00)) == > htonl(0xC0586300)) > +#define PRIVATE_192(x) (((x) & htonl(0xffff0000)) == htonl(0xC0A80000)) > +#define TEST_198(x) (((x) & htonl(0xfffe0000)) == htonl(0xC6120000)) > #endif > > #endif /* _LINUX_IN_H */ > --- linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/addrconf.h.orig 2007-11-08 > 12:06:17.000000000 -0800 > +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/addrconf.h 2007-11-09 > 08:12:29.000000000 -0800 > @@ -241,6 +241,14 @@ static inline int ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_ro > addr->s6_addr32[3] == htonl(0x00000002)); > } > > +#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6_ISATAP) > +/* only for IFF_ISATAP interfaces */ > +static inline int ipv6_addr_is_isatap(const struct in6_addr *addr) > +{ > + return ((addr->s6_addr32[2] | htonl(0x02000000)) == > htonl(0x02005EFE)); > +} > +#endif > + I don't see the need for the # if above. -vlad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
