In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:52:47 -0800), "Templin, 
Fred L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> > > > > > +   if (((ipv4 >= 0x01000000) && (ipv4 < 0x0a000000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0x0b000000) && (ipv4 < 0x7f000000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0x80000000) && (ipv4 < 0xa9fe0000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0xa9ff0000) && (ipv4 < 0xac100000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0xac200000) && (ipv4 < 0xc0a80000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0xc0a90000) && (ipv4 < 0xc6120000)) ||
> > > > > > +       ((ipv4 >= 0xc6140000) && (ipv4 < 
> > 0xe0000000))) eui[0] |=
> > > > > > 0x2;

> Maybe it is I who did not understand. Can you suggest a clean solution?

You could write each element as LOOPBACK(), MULTICAST()
etc.
        eui[0] = (!ZERONETO(a) &&
                  !PRIVATE_10(a) &&
                  !LINKLOCAL(a) &&
                  !PRIVATE_172(a) &&
                  !PRIVATE_192(a) &&
                  !NETICDEVBENCH(a) &&
                  !MULTICAST(a)) ? 2 : 0;

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to