David Miller wrote: > From: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:53:52 +0400 > >> This routine scans the ipv6_fl_list whose update is >> protected with the socket lock and the ip6_sk_fl_lock. >> >> Since the socket lock is not taken in the lookup, use >> the other one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Applied. > > But I notice that I was wrong in my email, we don't > hold the socket lock here. > > What prevents an unlink from the socket's list > and thus a reference count of zero occurring for > a brief moment?
Oops. You're right here :( I looked at the ip6_fl_lock and messed it with the ip6_sk_fl_lock. Should I resend the whole patch, or just make an incremental one? Thanks, Pavel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
