Hello,
Is it normal that TCP port randomization (tested with 2.6.22) works only
when explicitly binding to a IP address:
--- cut here ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
23:11:11.896126 IP 192.168.129.2.37839 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
23:11:12.146573 IP 192.168.129.2.37840 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
23:11:12.396488 IP 192.168.129.2.37841 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
--- cut here ---
--- cut here ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
(UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
23:11:31.704391 IP 192.168.129.2.57204 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
23:11:34.400048 IP 192.168.129.2.14512 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
23:11:34.606707 IP 192.168.129.2.20117 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
--- cut here ---
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
