Hi Yoshifuji,

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:
Dave, Brian,

Let me double check this patch.

Regards,

--yoshfuji

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:50:38 -0700), David Stevens 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

Brian,
        A multicast address should never be the target of a neighbor
discovery request; the sender should use the mapping function for all
multicasts. So, I'm not sure that your example can ever happen, and it
certainly is ok to send ICMPv6 errors to multicast addresses in general.
But I don't see that it hurts anything. either (since it should never happen :-)),

TAHI generates a lot of packets that shouldn't happen :) see below for the problem. The patch in ndisc_send_redirect() is probably unnecessary, but since the code was identical I figured it wouldn't hurt.

so I don't particularly object, either.
        I think it'd also be better if you add the check to be:

if (ipv6_addr_type(target) & (IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL|IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST))

I did have it:

if (ipv6_addr_type(target) &
    (IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL|IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST) ==
    (IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL|IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST))

but changed it since I had proposed ipv6_addr_linklocal() in a previous patch because there are other possible users of that.

This is the actual packet trace that was sent to me, edited to remove non-relevant data, but I've actually been unable to reproduce Packet 12 below (note the Destination MAC). My knee-jerk reaction was the proposed patch. It could just be timing-related, I'll do more testing Monday. Strangely, the TAHI test passes anyway, but it shouldn't.

Packet 10 : Icmpv6 : Redirect
Ethernet
Destination MAC.........................00:1A:4B:EB:FC:E6
Source MAC..............................00:00:10:10:10:60
Ipv6
Version.................................6
Next Header.............................58
Hop Limit...............................255
Source IP.....................FE80:0000:0000:0000:0200:10FF:FE10:1060
Destination IP................3000:0000:0000:0000:021A:4BFF:FEEB:FCE6
Icmpv6
Type....................................0x89
Code....................................0x00
Reserved................................0x00000000
Target Address................FF02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
Destination Address...........3001:0000:0000:0000:0200:10FF:FE10:1180
Options
LLAddressOption
  Option Type.............................2
  Option Length...........................1
  Link-Layer Address......................0x000010101061

Packet 11 : Icmpv6 : Echo Request
Ethernet
Destination MAC.........................00:1A:4B:EB:FC:E6
Source MAC..............................00:00:10:10:10:60
Ipv6
Version.................................6
Next Header.............................58
Hop Limit...............................255
Source IP.....................3001:0000:0000:0000:0200:10FF:FE10:1180
Destination IP................3000:0000:0000:0000:021A:4BFF:FEEB:FCE6
Icmpv6
Type....................................0x80
Code....................................0x00
Identifier..............................0x0000
Sequence Number.........................0x0000
Data....................................0x00

Packet 12 : Icmpv6 : Echo Reply
Ethernet
Destination MAC.........................33:33:00:00:00:01
Source MAC..............................00:1A:4B:EB:FC:E6
Ipv6
Version.................................6
Next Header.............................58
Hop Limit...............................64
Source IP.....................3000:0000:0000:0000:021A:4BFF:FEEB:FCE6
Destination IP................3001:0000:0000:0000:0200:10FF:FE10:1180
Icmpv6
Type....................................0x81
Code....................................0x00
Identifier..............................0x0000
Sequence Number.........................0x0000
Data....................................0x00

This should have been sent to 00:00:10:10:10:60

-Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to