On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:13:07 -0700
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into ixgbe.
I get a reject storm.
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -557,14 +557,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(int irq, void
> *data)
> struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter;
>
> IXGBE_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IXGBE_EIMC, rxr->eims_value);
> - netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev);
> + netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev, &adapter->napi);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
For example, my copy of ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(), from
git://lost.foo-projects.org/~aveerani/git/linux-2.6#ixgbe is:
static irqreturn_t ixgbe_msix_clean_rx(int irq, void *data)
{
struct ixgbe_ring *rxr = data;
struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter;
#ifndef CONFIG_IXGBE_NAPI
int i;
for (i = 0; i < IXGBE_MAX_INTR; i++)
if (unlikely(!ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(adapter, rxr)))
break;
#else
IXGBE_WRITE_REG(&adapter->hw, IXGBE_EIMC, rxr->eims_value);
netif_rx_schedule(adapter->netdev);
#endif
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
which is quite different from the function whcih you're altering here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html