I was perusing Documentation/networking/bonding.txt in a 2.6.23-rc5 tree and came across the following discussing the round-robin scheduling:

        Note that this out of order delivery occurs when both the
        sending and receiving systems are utilizing a multiple
        interface bond.  Consider a configuration in which a
        balance-rr bond feeds into a single higher capacity network
        channel (e.g., multiple 100Mb/sec ethernets feeding a single
        gigabit ethernet via an etherchannel capable switch).  In this
        configuration, traffic sent from the multiple 100Mb devices to
        a destination connected to the gigabit device will not see
packets out of order.

My first reaction was that this was incorrect - it didn't matter if the receiver was using a single link or not because the packets flowing across the multiple 100Mb links could hit the intermediate device out of order and so stay that way across the GbE link.

Before I go and patch-out that text I thought I'd double check.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to