From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:16:32 +0300
> SACK processing code has been a sort of russian roulette as no > validation of SACK blocks is previously attempted. Besides, it > is not very clear what all kinds of broken SACK blocks really > mean (e.g., one that has start and end sequence numbers > reversed). So now close the roulette once and for all. > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks a lot for coding this up, I like it a lot, applied. I have some minor worries about the D-SACK lower bound, but it's probably OK and I'm just being paranoid :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
