On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:54:32AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 01:33:26AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > I would strongly prefer that vortex_up return a value, since all the > > important callers of this function can themselves return an error back > > to the system. > > > > we can definitely return a meaningful return value here, if > > pci_enable_device() fails, and I would rather not apply a patch that > > fails to propagate a serious condition (pci_enable_device failure is > > indeed serious) when it is possible to do so > > > > OK. Any comments on this revised version? I have only ignored the return of > vortex_up in vortex_error. It is not immediately clear what to do if > vortex_up still fails there after a pci reset. > > Mark > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c > index 001c66d..a1dfd6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c > +++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c > @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static struct { > > static int vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev, void __iomem *ioaddr, int > irq, > int chip_idx, int card_idx); > -static void vortex_up(struct net_device *dev); > +static int vortex_up(struct net_device *dev); > static void vortex_down(struct net_device *dev, int final); > static int vortex_open(struct net_device *dev); > static void mdio_sync(void __iomem *ioaddr, int bits); > @@ -841,8 +841,11 @@ static int vortex_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev) > return -EBUSY; > } > if (netif_running(dev)) { > - vortex_up(dev); > - netif_device_attach(dev); > + err = vortex_up(dev); > + if (err) > + return err; > + else > + netif_device_attach(dev); > } > } > return 0;
I think we should free the requested irq if vortex_up really fails here. Steffen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html