On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:54:32AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 01:33:26AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I would strongly prefer that vortex_up return a value, since all the 
> > important callers of this function can themselves return an error back 
> > to the system.
> > 
> > we can definitely return a meaningful return value here, if 
> > pci_enable_device() fails, and I would rather not apply a patch that 
> > fails to propagate a serious condition (pci_enable_device failure is 
> > indeed serious) when it is possible to do so
> > 
> 
> OK. Any comments on this revised version? I have only ignored the return of
> vortex_up in vortex_error. It is not immediately clear what to do if
> vortex_up still fails there after a pci reset.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> index 001c66d..a1dfd6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static struct {
>  
>  static int vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev, void __iomem *ioaddr, int 
> irq,
>                                  int chip_idx, int card_idx);
> -static void vortex_up(struct net_device *dev);
> +static int vortex_up(struct net_device *dev);
>  static void vortex_down(struct net_device *dev, int final);
>  static int vortex_open(struct net_device *dev);
>  static void mdio_sync(void __iomem *ioaddr, int bits);
> @@ -841,8 +841,11 @@ static int vortex_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>                       return -EBUSY;
>               }
>               if (netif_running(dev)) {
> -                     vortex_up(dev);
> -                     netif_device_attach(dev);
> +                     err = vortex_up(dev);
> +                     if (err)
> +                             return err;
> +                     else  
> +                             netif_device_attach(dev);
>               }
>       }
>       return 0;

I think we should free the requested irq if vortex_up really fails here.


Steffen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to