Jeff, Roland,
Thanks for taking a look.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5710,
> > + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, BCM5710 },
FWIW, this could be neater as
{ PCI_VDEVICE(BROADCOM, PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5710), BCM5710 }
OK
Yes. And additionally, I prefer (but not require) that people directly
use a hexidecimal constant in the PCI ID table for device ID, if that is
the only place in the entire codebase referring to that PCI device ID.
Using a named constant for a single-use PCI device ID merely aggrevates
include/linux/pci_ids.h patching headache for what is ultimately an
arbitrary number [usually] picked out of thin air by the hw vendor.
Jeff
For now it is the only place used, but this will change very soon, once
we have several flavors of the chip out. then we will have to handle
each in a slightly different manner.
Eliezer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html