On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 10:13 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > I wanted to test them all on 2.6.22.1, but I didn't have enough time.
> > I've verified only that 2.6.22.1 has the same problem. I can test it
> > later, but I can report results back at beginning of next week.
>
>
> So, everything is clear - any changes are good!
> Except the signed-off ones...
>
> Thanks Marcin,
> Jarek P.
>
> PS: Now, it seems to me Thomas could be the nearest. BTW, could somebody
> give me some tip, how these re-triggered interrupts are skipped on dev's
> reset before enable_irq?
I think the correct solution is really not to resend level type
interrupts. If the interrupt line is still active, then the interrupt
comes up by itself. I'm cooking a patch for that.
The other question is:
Is the driver confused by the resent irq or is the chip-set unhappy
about the resend ?
We could figure the latter out by activating the software based resend
method.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
