On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:45 -0400, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Joy Latten wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 13:17:22.000000000 > > -0500 > > +++ linux-2.6.22.patch/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 > > 13:21:29.000000000 -0500 > > @@ -108,10 +108,7 @@ > > #define AUDIT_MAC_CIPSOV4_DEL 1408 /* NetLabel: del CIPSOv4 DOI > > entry */ > > #define AUDIT_MAC_MAP_ADD 1409 /* NetLabel: add LSM domain mapping */ > > #define AUDIT_MAC_MAP_DEL 1410 /* NetLabel: del LSM domain mapping */ > > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_ADDSA 1411 /* Add a XFRM state */ > > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSA 1412 /* Delete a XFRM state */ > > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_ADDSPD 1413 /* Add a XFRM policy */ > > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSPD 1414 /* Delete a XFRM policy */ > > +#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_EVENT 1411 /* Audit IPSec events */ > > Will this cause existing applications to break? >
Perhaps someone in audit list could help answer this. During testing, because I changed the above defines, all IPSec events are listed as "MAC_IPSEC_ADDSA" for now without userspace change. Is this ok? Or is there a better way to migrate this change in? Perhaps leave previous IPsec defines and just add in a new one and use it? If that is better approach, let me know and I will change code to accomodate. Regards, Joy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
