On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:32 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > How about separate autoneg to a property "dumb-phy", which > > indicates the > > PHY/switch doesn't provide MII register interface. > > Something like that I suppose. But don't call it "dumb phy", > nor "fake phy", nor anything similar -- there simply is _no_ > phy. If the Linux code wants to pretend there is one, that's > one thing, but there is no need to do any of this trickery in > the device tree. > > > Therefore, it should > > use the fixed speed and duplex from device node rather than registers. > > Yes.
Not sure I follow, something like this? initial-phy-capacity = <speed duplex> no-mdio-interface autoneg does not fit in there. Jocke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
