On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:38:04PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [5/9] netconsole: Introduce dev_status member
>
> Introduce a new member in netconsole_target that tracks the status (up or
> down) of the underlying interface network device that the specific logging
> target netpoll is attached to.
>
> We then join this up with the just-introduced net_device notifier, and
> introduce NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_DOWN notifications. By disabling the target
> when the corresponding local interface is down, we save the overhead of
> unnecessarily disabling interrupts and calling into the netpoll stack in
> console->write().
Yuck.
> +/*
> + * Why no net_dev_is_up() in netdevice.h? The kernel could lose a lot of
> + * weight if only netdevice.h had the good sense to export such a function.
> + * Oh well ...
> + */
> +static inline int net_dev_is_up(struct net_device *net_dev)
> +{
> + return ((net_dev->flags & IFF_UP) == IFF_UP);
> +}
Why editorialize? Why not just add this to netdevice.h?
> + if (nt->dev_status) {
Why not simply call net_dev_is_up?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
