YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
>                                        IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
> @@ -465,6 +440,8 @@ looped_back:
>               break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
>       case IPV6_SRCRT_TYPE_2:
> +             if (accept_source_route < 0)
> +                     goto unknown_rh;
>               /* Silently discard invalid RTH type 2 */
>               if (hdr->hdrlen != 2 || hdr->segments_left != 1) {
>                       IP6_INC_STATS_BH(ip6_dst_idev(skb->dst),

Do we really want to do this.  The IPv6 working group is bending over backwards
in it's attempt to _not_ break MIPv6 while deprecating RH0.  The ability to 
"break"
MIPv6 by disable RH2 without disabling the rest of MIP seems a "bad thing" to 
me.

-vlad

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to