Hi Peter, Heiko,
On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 13:15 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2021, 13:03:25 CEST schrieb Peter Geis:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 7:37 PM Ezequiel Garcia <ezequ...@collabora.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > +static void rk3566_set_to_rmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> > > > > + dev_err(dev, "%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n",
> > > > > __func__);
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3568_GRF_GMAC1_CON1,
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static void rk3568_set_to_rgmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv,
> > > > > + int tx_delay, int rx_delay)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> > > > > + dev_err(dev, "Missing rockchip,grf property\n");
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3568_GRF_GMAC0_CON1,
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3568_GRF_GMAC0_CON0,
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(rx_delay) |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(tx_delay));
> > > > > +
> > > > > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3568_GRF_GMAC1_CON1,
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3568_GRF_GMAC1_CON0,
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(rx_delay) |
> > > > > + RK3568_GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(tx_delay));
> > > >
> > > > Since there are two GMACs on the rk3568, and either, or, or both may
> > > > be enabled in various configurations, we should only configure the
> > > > controller we are currently operating.
> >
> > Perhaps we should have match data (such as reg = <0>, or against the
> > address) to identify the individual controllers.
>
> Hmm, "reg" will be used by the actual mmio address of the controller,
> so matching against that should be the way I guess.
>
> We're already doing something similar for dsi:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c#n1170
>
I have to admit, I'm not a fan of hardcoding the registers in the kernel.
David Wu solved this in the downstream kernel by using bus_id,
which parses the devicetree "ethernet@0" node, i.e.:
plat->bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "ethernet");
I'm inclined for this solution. Maybe Jose can suggest how to approach it?
Thanks!
Ezequiel
