From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

After commit 0f6925b3e8da ("virtio_net: Do not pull payload in skb->head")
Guenter Roeck reported one failure in his tests using sh architecture.

After much debugging, we have been able to spot silent unaligned accesses
in inet_gro_receive()

The issue at hand is that upper networking stacks assume their header
is word-aligned. Low level drivers are supposed to reserve NET_IP_ALIGN
bytes before the Ethernet header to make that happen.

This patch hardens skb_gro_reset_offset() to not allow frag0 fast-path
if the fragment is not properly aligned.

Some arches like x86, arm64 and powerpc do not care and define NET_IP_ALIGN
as 0, this extra check will be a NOP for them.

Note that if frag0 is not used, GRO will call pskb_may_pull()
as many times as needed to pull network and transport headers.

Fixes: 0f6925b3e8da ("virtio_net: Do not pull payload in skb->head")
Fixes: 78a478d0efd9 ("gro: Inline skb_gro_header and cache frag0 virtual 
address")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 
af8c1ea040b9364b076e2d72f04dc3de2d7e2f11..1f79b9aa9a3f2392fddd1401f95ad098b5e03204
 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5924,7 +5924,8 @@ static void skb_gro_reset_offset(struct sk_buff *skb)
        NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = 0;
 
        if (!skb_headlen(skb) && pinfo->nr_frags &&
-           !PageHighMem(skb_frag_page(frag0))) {
+           !PageHighMem(skb_frag_page(frag0)) &&
+           (!NET_IP_ALIGN || !(skb_frag_off(frag0) & 3))) {
                NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 = skb_frag_address(frag0);
                NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = min_t(unsigned int,
                                                    skb_frag_size(frag0),
-- 
2.31.1.295.g9ea45b61b8-goog

Reply via email to