On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:23 AM Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am still planning to have Yunsheng Lin's (CCing) fix [1] tested in the > coming days. If it works, then we can consider proceeding with it, > otherwise I am all for reverting the whole NOLOCK stuff. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/[email protected]/T/#u
I personally prefer to just revert that bit, as it brings more troubles than gains. Even with Yunsheng's patch, there are still some issues. Essentially, I think the core qdisc scheduling code is not ready for lockless, just look at those NOLOCK checks in sch_generic.c. :-/ Thanks.
