On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:20:14AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > @@ -11043,6 +11046,11 @@ int dev_change_net_namespace(struct net_device 
> > *dev, struct net *net, const char
> >                     goto out;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   /* Check that new_ifindex isn't used yet. */
> > +   err = -EBUSY;
> > +   if (new_ifindex && __dev_get_by_index(net, new_ifindex))
> > +           goto out;
> 
> Should this maybe verify that the new_inindex isn't negative and reject
> it right away? (Maybe also right where we first retrieve it?) Otherwise
> __dev_get_by_index() might pointlessly walk the whole netdev list for
> thet network namespace.
> 

I think __dev_get_by_index works fine for links with negative
ifindices, but there are other places where we expect that ifindex is
positive, so I think you are right, we need to check that it isn't
negative here and we need to add the same check in register_netdevice
too.

Thanks,
Andrei

Reply via email to