On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 18:41 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 00:46:18 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > I hit an hangup on napi_disable(), when the threaded > > mode is enabled and the napi is under heavy traffic. > > > > If the relevant napi has been scheduled and the napi_disable() > > kicks in before the next napi_threaded_wait() completes - so > > that the latter quits due to the napi_disable_pending() condition, > > the existing code leaves the NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit set and the > > napi_disable() loop waiting for such bit will hang. > > > > Address the issue explicitly clearing the SCHED_BIT on napi_thread > > termination, if the thread is owns the napi. > > > > Fixes: 29863d41bb6e ("net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support") > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> > > --- > > net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > > index b4c67a5be606d..e2e716ba027b8 100644 > > --- a/net/core/dev.c > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > > @@ -7059,6 +7059,14 @@ static int napi_thread_wait(struct napi_struct *napi) > > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > } > > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > > + > > + /* if the thread owns this napi, and the napi itself has been disabled > > + * in-between napi_schedule() and the above napi_disable_pending() > > + * check, we need to clear the SCHED bit here, or napi_disable > > + * will hang waiting for such bit being cleared > > + */ > > + if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, &napi->state) || woken) > > + clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state); > > Not sure this covers 100% of the cases. We depend on the ability to go > through schedule() "unnecessarily" when the napi gets scheduled after > we go into TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE.
Empirically this patch fixes my test case (napi_disable/napi_enable in a loop with the relevant napi under a lot of UDP traffic). If I understand correctly, the critical scenario you see is something alike: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 // napi_threaded_poll() main loop napi_complete_done() // napi_threaded_poll() loop completes napi_schedule() // set SCHED bit // NOT set SCHED_THREAD // wake_up_process() is // a no op napi_disable() // set DISABLE bit napi_thread_wait() set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); // napi_thread_wait() loop completes, // SCHED_THREAD bit is cleared and // wake is false > If we just check woken outside of the loop it may be false even though > we got a "wake event". I think in the above example even the normal processing will be fooled?!? e.g. even without the napi_disable(), napi_thread_wait() will will miss the event/will not understand to it really own the napi and will call schedule(). It looks a different problem to me ?!? I *think* that replacing inside the napi_thread_wait() loop: if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, &napi->state) || woken) with: unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(napi->state); if (state & NAPIF_STATE_SCHED && !(state & (NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL | NAPIF_STATE_DISABLE)) should solve it and should also allow removing the NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED bit. I feel like I'm missing some relevant point here. > Looking closer now I don't really understand where we ended up with > disable handling :S Seems like the thread exits on napi_disable(), > but is reaped by netif_napi_del(). Some drivers (*cough* nfp) will > go napi_disable() -> napi_enable()... and that will break. > > Am I missing something? > > Should we not stay in the wait loop on napi_disable()? Here I do not follow?!? Modulo the tiny race (which i was unable to trigger so far) above napi_disable()/napi_enable() loops work correctly here. Could you please re-phrase? Thanks! Paolo