From: Dario Binacchi <dario...@libero.it>
After reading the commit 640916db2bf7 ("can: c_can: Make it SMP safe")
it may sound strange to see the IF_RX interface used by the
can_inval_tx_object function. A comment was added to avoid any
misunderstanding.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210302215435.18286-4-dario...@libero.it
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario...@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index 8212f3d98aa9..980abf6a8609 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -710,6 +710,11 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
idx--;
pend &= ~(1 << idx);
obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
+
+ /* We use IF_RX interface instead of IF_TX because we
+ * are called from c_can_poll(), which runs inside
+ * NAPI. We are not trasmitting.
+ */
c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
--
2.30.2
