Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang <[email protected]> > > Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg, > it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock > to protect this list like protecting other skb queues. > > __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking, > it still has to use lock_sock. > > Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> > Cc: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> > ---
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
