On 23/03/2021 03:05, zuoqil...@163.com wrote:
> From: zuoqilin <zuoqi...@yulong.com>
> 
> Simplify the return expression of smc_ism_signal_shutdown().
> 
> Signed-off-by: zuoqilin <zuoqi...@yulong.com>
> ---
>  net/smc/smc_ism.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> index 9c6e958..c3558cc 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ static void smcd_handle_sw_event(struct 
> smc_ism_event_work *wrk)
>  
>  int smc_ism_signal_shutdown(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
>  {
> -     int rc;
>       union smcd_sw_event_info ev_info;
>  
>       if (lgr->peer_shutdown)
> @@ -353,11 +352,10 @@ int smc_ism_signal_shutdown(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
>       memcpy(ev_info.uid, lgr->id, SMC_LGR_ID_SIZE);
>       ev_info.vlan_id = lgr->vlan_id;
>       ev_info.code = ISM_EVENT_REQUEST;
> -     rc = lgr->smcd->ops->signal_event(lgr->smcd, lgr->peer_gid,
> +     return lgr->smcd->ops->signal_event(lgr->smcd, lgr->peer_gid,
>                                         ISM_EVENT_REQUEST_IR,
>                                         ISM_EVENT_CODE_SHUTDOWN,
>                                         ev_info.info);

I agree with the code change but after I applied your patch the 3 lines above
are no longer correctly indented, please correct that and resend the patch.
Thanks.

> -     return rc;
>  }
>  
>  /* worker for SMC-D events */
> 

-- 
Karsten

(I'm a dude)

Reply via email to