On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:45:03AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 20:25, Tobias Waldekranz <tob...@waldekranz.com> > wrote: > > Add support for offloading learning and broadcast flooding flags. With > > this in place, mv88e6xx supports offloading of all bridge port flags > > that are currently supported by the bridge. > > > > Broadcast flooding is somewhat awkward to control as there is no > > per-port bit for this like there is for unknown unicast and unknown > > multicast. Instead we have to update the ATU entry for the broadcast > > address for all currently used FIDs. > > > > v2 -> v3: > > - Only return a netdev from dsa_port_to_bridge_port if the port is > > currently bridged (Vladimir & Florian) > > > > v1 -> v2: > > - Ensure that mv88e6xxx_vtu_get handles VID 0 (Vladimir) > > - Fixed off-by-one in mv88e6xxx_port_set_assoc_vector (Vladimir) > > - Fast age all entries on port when disabling learning (Vladimir) > > - Correctly detect bridge flags on LAG ports (Vladimir) > > > > Tobias Waldekranz (8): > > net: dsa: Add helper to resolve bridge port from DSA port > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid useless attempts to fast-age LAGs > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Provide generic VTU iterator > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use standard helper for broadcast address > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood all traffic classes on standalone ports > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag > > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge broadcast flooding flag > > > > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c | 21 +++ > > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 2 + > > include/net/dsa.h | 14 ++ > > net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 14 +- > > 5 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > Jakub/Dave, is anything blocking this series from going in? I am unable > to find the series on patchwork, is that why?
Tobias, the series went in: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=d7417ee918582504076ec1a74dfcd5fe1f55696c I'm not sure why the patchwork bot didn't go "deet-doot-dot, I am a bot" on us.
