On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 00:59, Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com> > > DSA is aware of switches with global VLAN filtering since the blamed > commit, but it makes a bad decision when multiple bridges are spanning > the same switch: > > ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 > ip link add br1 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 > ip link set swp2 master br0 > ip link set swp3 master br0 > ip link set swp4 master br1 > ip link set swp5 master br1 > ip link set swp5 nomaster > ip link set swp4 nomaster > [138665.939930] sja1105 spi0.1: port 3: dsa_core: VLAN filtering is a global > setting > [138665.947514] DSA: failed to notify DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_LEAVE > > When all ports leave br1, DSA blindly attempts to disable VLAN filtering > on the switch, ignoring the fact that br0 still exists and is VLAN-aware > too. It fails while doing that. > > This patch checks whether any port exists at all and is under a > VLAN-aware bridge. > > Fixes: d371b7c92d19 ("net: dsa: Unset vlan_filtering when ports leave the > bridge") > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com> > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > --- > net/dsa/switch.c | 15 +++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c > index 4b5da89dc27a..32963276452f 100644 > --- a/net/dsa/switch.c > +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, > bool unset_vlan_filtering = br_vlan_enabled(info->br); > struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst; > struct netlink_ext_ack extack = {0}; > - int err, i; > + int err, port; > > if (dst->index == info->tree_index && ds->index == info->sw_index && > ds->ops->port_bridge_join) > @@ -124,13 +124,16 @@ static int dsa_switch_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch > *ds, > * it. That is a good thing, because that lets us handle it and also > * handle the case where the switch's vlan_filtering setting is global > * (not per port). When that happens, the correct moment to trigger the > - * vlan_filtering callback is only when the last port left this bridge. > + * vlan_filtering callback is only when the last port leaves the last > + * VLAN-aware bridge. > */ > if (unset_vlan_filtering && ds->vlan_filtering_is_global) { > - for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) { > - if (i == info->port) > - continue; > - if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev == info->br) { > + for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) { > + struct net_device *bridge_dev; > + > + bridge_dev = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge_dev; > + > + if (bridge_dev && br_vlan_enabled(bridge_dev)) { > unset_vlan_filtering = false; > break; > } > -- > 2.25.1
Is it the case that all devices in which VLAN filtering is a global setting are also single-chip? To my _D_SA eyes, it feels like we should have to iterate over all ports in the tree, not just the switch.