On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:43 +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> I'm not sure if you did it on purpose in commit aaa5d90b395a7
> ("net: use indirect call wrappers at GRO network layer").
> Was that intentional
I must admit that 2y+ later my own intentions are not so clear to me
too;)
> for the sake of more optimized path for the
> kernels with moduled IPv6,
Uhm... no I guess that was more an underlook on my side.
> or I can replace INDIRECT_CALL_INET()
> with INDIRECT_CALL_2() here too?
If that build with IPV6=nmy, I would say yes.
> I want to keep GRO callbacks that
> make use of indirect call wrappers unified.
L4 will still need some special handling as ipv6 udp gro callbacks are
not builtin with CONFIG_IPV6=m :(
Cheers,
Paolo
