From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:22:14 -0700

Hi,

> From: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
>
> Currently sockmap calls into each protocol to update the struct
> proto and replace it. This certainly won't work when the protocol
> is implemented as a module, for example, AF_UNIX.
>
> Introduce a new ops sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot(), so each
> protocol can implement its own way to replace the struct proto.
> This also helps get rid of symbol dependencies on CONFIG_INET.
>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <ja...@cloudflare.com>
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <l...@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skmsg.h | 18 +++---------------
>  include/net/sock.h    |  3 +++
>  include/net/tcp.h     |  1 +
>  include/net/udp.h     |  1 +
>  net/core/skmsg.c      |  5 -----
>  net/core/sock_map.c   | 24 ++++--------------------
>  net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c   |  3 +++
>  net/ipv4/udp.c        |  3 +++
>  net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c    | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c   |  3 +++
>  net/ipv6/udp.c        |  3 +++
>  12 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> index 77e5d890ec4b..eb2757c0295d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct sk_psock {
>       void (*saved_close)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
>       void (*saved_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
>       void (*saved_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
> +     int  (*psock_update_sk_prot)(struct sock *sk, bool restore);
>       struct proto                    *sk_proto;
>       struct sk_psock_work_state      work_state;
>       struct work_struct              work;
> @@ -397,25 +398,12 @@ static inline void sk_psock_cork_free(struct sk_psock 
> *psock)
>       }
>  }
>
> -static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk,
> -                                      struct sk_psock *psock,
> -                                      struct proto *ops)
> -{
> -     /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> -     WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, ops);
> -}
> -
>  static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
>                                         struct sk_psock *psock)
>  {
>       sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;
> -     if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
> -             tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, psock->saved_write_space);
> -     } else {
> -             sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;
> -             /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> -             WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, psock->sk_proto);
> -     }
> +     if (psock->psock_update_sk_prot)
> +             psock->psock_update_sk_prot(sk, true);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sk_psock_set_state(struct sk_psock *psock,
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 636810ddcd9b..eda64fbd5e3d 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1184,6 +1184,9 @@ struct proto {
>       void                    (*unhash)(struct sock *sk);
>       void                    (*rehash)(struct sock *sk);
>       int                     (*get_port)(struct sock *sk, unsigned short 
> snum);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +     int                     (*psock_update_sk_prot)(struct sock *sk, bool 
> restore);
> +#endif
>
>       /* Keeping track of sockets in use */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 075de26f449d..2efa4e5ea23d 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -2203,6 +2203,7 @@ struct sk_psock;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
>  struct proto *tcp_bpf_get_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
> +int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, bool restore);
>  void tcp_bpf_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
>
> diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> index d4d064c59232..df7cc1edc200 100644
> --- a/include/net/udp.h
> +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *udp_rcv_segment(struct sock 
> *sk,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
>  struct sk_psock;
>  struct proto *udp_bpf_get_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock);
> +int udp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, bool restore);
>  #endif
>
>  #endif       /* _UDP_H */
> diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> index 5cba52862334..e93683a287a0 100644
> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -559,11 +559,6 @@ struct sk_psock *sk_psock_init(struct sock *sk, int node)
>
>       write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>
> -     if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
> -             psock = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
>       if (sk->sk_user_data) {
>               psock = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>               goto out;
> diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
> index 33f8c854db4f..596cbac24091 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock_map.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
> @@ -184,26 +184,10 @@ static void sock_map_unref(struct sock *sk, void 
> *link_raw)
>
>  static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
>  {
> -     struct proto *prot;
> -
> -     switch (sk->sk_type) {
> -     case SOCK_STREAM:
> -             prot = tcp_bpf_get_proto(sk, psock);
> -             break;
> -
> -     case SOCK_DGRAM:
> -             prot = udp_bpf_get_proto(sk, psock);
> -             break;
> -
> -     default:
> +     if (!sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot)
>               return -EINVAL;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (IS_ERR(prot))
> -             return PTR_ERR(prot);
> -
> -     sk_psock_update_proto(sk, psock, prot);
> -     return 0;
> +     psock->psock_update_sk_prot = sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot;
> +     return sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot(sk, false);

Regarding that both {tcp,udp}_bpf_update_proto() is global and
for now they are the only two implemented callbacks, wouldn't it
be worthy to straighten the calls here? Like

        return INDIRECT_CALL_2(sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot,
                               tcp_bpf_update_proto,
                               udp_bpf_update_proto,
                               sk, false);

(the same in sk_psock_restore_proto() then)

Or this code path is not performance-critical?

>  }
>
>  static struct sk_psock *sock_map_psock_get_checked(struct sock *sk)
> @@ -570,7 +554,7 @@ static bool sock_map_redirect_allowed(const struct sock 
> *sk)
>
>  static bool sock_map_sk_is_suitable(const struct sock *sk)
>  {
> -     return sk_is_tcp(sk) || sk_is_udp(sk);
> +     return !!sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot;
>  }
>
>  static bool sock_map_sk_state_allowed(const struct sock *sk)
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> index ae980716d896..ac8cfbaeacd2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> @@ -595,20 +595,38 @@ static int tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(struct proto *ops)
>              ops->sendpage == tcp_sendpage ? 0 : -ENOTSUPP;
>  }
>
> -struct proto *tcp_bpf_get_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
> +int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, bool restore)
>  {
> +     struct sk_psock *psock = sk_psock(sk);
>       int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TCP_BPF_IPV6 : TCP_BPF_IPV4;
>       int config = psock->progs.msg_parser   ? TCP_BPF_TX   : TCP_BPF_BASE;
>
> +     if (restore) {
> +             if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
> +                     tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, 
> psock->saved_write_space);
> +             } else {
> +                     sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;
> +                     /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> +                     WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, psock->sk_proto);
> +             }
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
>               if (tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(psock->sk_proto))
> -                     return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +                     return -EINVAL;
>
>               tcp_bpf_check_v6_needs_rebuild(psock->sk_proto);
>       }
>
> -     return &tcp_bpf_prots[family][config];
> +     /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> +     WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, &tcp_bpf_prots[family][config]);
> +     return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_update_proto);
>
>  /* If a child got cloned from a listening socket that had tcp_bpf
>   * protocol callbacks installed, we need to restore the callbacks to
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index daad4f99db32..dfc6d1c0e710 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -2806,6 +2806,9 @@ struct proto tcp_prot = {
>       .hash                   = inet_hash,
>       .unhash                 = inet_unhash,
>       .get_port               = inet_csk_get_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +     .psock_update_sk_prot   = tcp_bpf_update_proto,
> +#endif
>       .enter_memory_pressure  = tcp_enter_memory_pressure,
>       .leave_memory_pressure  = tcp_leave_memory_pressure,
>       .stream_memory_free     = tcp_stream_memory_free,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 4a0478b17243..38952aaee3a1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -2849,6 +2849,9 @@ struct proto udp_prot = {
>       .unhash                 = udp_lib_unhash,
>       .rehash                 = udp_v4_rehash,
>       .get_port               = udp_v4_get_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +     .psock_update_sk_prot   = udp_bpf_update_proto,
> +#endif
>       .memory_allocated       = &udp_memory_allocated,
>       .sysctl_mem             = sysctl_udp_mem,
>       .sysctl_wmem_offset     = offsetof(struct net, 
> ipv4.sysctl_udp_wmem_min),
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
> index 7a94791efc1a..6001f93cd3a0 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
> @@ -41,12 +41,23 @@ static int __init udp_bpf_v4_build_proto(void)
>  }
>  core_initcall(udp_bpf_v4_build_proto);
>
> -struct proto *udp_bpf_get_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
> +int udp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, bool restore)
>  {
>       int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET ? UDP_BPF_IPV4 : UDP_BPF_IPV6;
> +     struct sk_psock *psock = sk_psock(sk);
> +
> +     if (restore) {
> +             sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;
> +             /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> +             WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, psock->sk_proto);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
>
>       if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
>               udp_bpf_check_v6_needs_rebuild(psock->sk_proto);
>
> -     return &udp_bpf_prots[family];
> +     /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> +     WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot, &udp_bpf_prots[family]);
> +     return 0;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp_bpf_update_proto);
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> index bd44ded7e50c..4fdc58a9e19e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> @@ -2134,6 +2134,9 @@ struct proto tcpv6_prot = {
>       .hash                   = inet6_hash,
>       .unhash                 = inet_unhash,
>       .get_port               = inet_csk_get_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +     .psock_update_sk_prot   = tcp_bpf_update_proto,
> +#endif
>       .enter_memory_pressure  = tcp_enter_memory_pressure,
>       .leave_memory_pressure  = tcp_leave_memory_pressure,
>       .stream_memory_free     = tcp_stream_memory_free,
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> index d25e5a9252fd..ef2c75bb4771 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
> @@ -1713,6 +1713,9 @@ struct proto udpv6_prot = {
>       .unhash                 = udp_lib_unhash,
>       .rehash                 = udp_v6_rehash,
>       .get_port               = udp_v6_get_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +     .psock_update_sk_prot   = udp_bpf_update_proto,
> +#endif
>       .memory_allocated       = &udp_memory_allocated,
>       .sysctl_mem             = sysctl_udp_mem,
>       .sysctl_wmem_offset     = offsetof(struct net, 
> ipv4.sysctl_udp_wmem_min),
> --
> 2.25.1

Thanks,
Al

Reply via email to