jamal wrote:
> All patches looked really good. speaking for the ifb stuff, a definete
> ACK. 
> The only thing that threw me off for a sec was the naming convention for
> "type" referenced via IFLA_INFO_NAME because it seems to be colliding
> semantic with dev->type and dev->name as in IFLA_NAME and  
> ifi_type ifinfomsg.
> But i cant come with a better noun. 


How about IFLA_INFO_KIND (borrowed from sch_api)? I generally don't
like the IFLA_INFO_ prefix very much, but so far didn't come up with
something better. Suggestions welcome :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to