Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:26:12AM CET, k...@kernel.org wrote:
>Currently devlink health does not give user any clear information
>of what kind of remediation ->recover callback will perform. This
>makes it difficult to understand the impact of enabling auto-
>-remediation, and the severity of the error itself.
>
>To allow users to make more informed decision add a new remediation
>type attribute.
>
>Note that we only allow one remediation type per reporter, this
>is intentional. devlink health is not built for mixing issues
>of different severity into one reporter since it only maintains
>one dump, of the first event and a single error counter.
>Nudging vendors towards categorizing issues beyond coarse
>groups is an added bonus.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
>---
> include/net/devlink.h        |  2 ++
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/core/devlink.c           |  7 ++++++-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>index b424328af658..72b37769761f 100644
>--- a/include/net/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>@@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ struct devlink_health_reporter;
> /**
>  * struct devlink_health_reporter_ops - Reporter operations
>  * @name: reporter name
>+ * remedy: severity of the remediation required
>  * @recover: callback to recover from reported error
>  *           if priv_ctx is NULL, run a full recover
>  * @dump: callback to dump an object
>@@ -669,6 +670,7 @@ struct devlink_health_reporter;
> 
> struct devlink_health_reporter_ops {
>       char *name;
>+      enum devlink_health_remedy remedy;
>       int (*recover)(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
>                      void *priv_ctx, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>       int (*dump)(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>index 41a6ea3b2256..8cd1508b525b 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>@@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>       DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION_STATS,       /* nested */
> 
>       DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER,        /* u32 */
>+
>+      DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY,    /* u32 */
>+
>       /* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
> 
>       __DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
>@@ -620,4 +623,26 @@ enum devlink_health_state {
>       DL_HEALTH_STATE_ERROR,
> };
> 
>+/**
>+ * enum devlink_health_reporter_remedy - severity of remediation procedure
>+ * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE: transient error, no remediation required
>+ * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_KICK: device stalled, processing will be re-triggered
>+ * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_COMP_RESET: associated device component (e.g. device 
>queue)
>+ *                    will be reset
>+ * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_RESET: full device reset, will result in temporary
>+ *                    unavailability of the device, device configuration
>+ *                    should not be lost
>+ * @DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_REINIT: device will be reinitialized and configuration 
>lost
>+ *
>+ * Used in %DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY, categorizes the health 
>reporter
>+ * by the severity of the remediation.
>+ */
>+enum devlink_health_remedy {
>+      DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_NONE = 1,
>+      DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_KICK,
>+      DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_COMP_RESET,
>+      DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_RESET,
>+      DL_HEALTH_REMEDY_REINIT,

It is nice if enum name and values are consistent:
enum something {
        SOMETHING_*


>+};
>+
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_DEVLINK_H_ */
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index 8e4e4bd7bb36..09d77d43ff63 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -6095,7 +6095,8 @@ __devlink_health_reporter_create(struct devlink *devlink,
> {
>       struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter;
> 
>-      if (WARN_ON(graceful_period && !ops->recover))
>+      if (WARN_ON(graceful_period && !ops->recover) ||
>+          WARN_ON(ops->recover && !ops->remedy))
>               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> 
>       reporter = kzalloc(sizeof(*reporter), GFP_KERNEL);
>@@ -6265,6 +6266,10 @@ devlink_nl_health_reporter_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
>       if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_NAME,
>                          reporter->ops->name))
>               goto reporter_nest_cancel;
>+      if (reporter->ops->remedy &&
>+          nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_REMEDY,
>+                      reporter->ops->remedy))
>+              goto reporter_nest_cancel;
>       if (nla_put_u8(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_REPORTER_STATE,
>                      reporter->health_state))
>               goto reporter_nest_cancel;
>-- 
>2.29.2
>

Reply via email to