On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:28:11PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
Hi Tobias
As with Florian, i've not been following the discussion.
> Yeah sorry, I can imagine that makes no sense whatsoever without the
> context of the recent discussions. It is basically guarding against this
> situation:
>
> .100 br0 .100
> \ / \ /
> lan0 lan1
>
> $ ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> $ ip link add dev lan0.100 link lan0 type vlan id 100
> $ ip link add dev lan1.100 link lan1 type vlan id 100
> $ ip link set dev lan0 master br0
> $ ip link set dev lan1 master br0 # This should fail
Given the complexity at hand, maybe consider putting this all into the
code?
Andrew
