On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:21:14 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:30:20 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote:  
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c
> > > index be1224b4447b..f7a2ec150e54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c
> > > @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int dp83822_config_intr(struct phy_device 
> > > *phydev)
> > >  
> > >  static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > >  {
> > > + bool trigger_machine = false;
> > >   int irq_status;
> > >  
> > >   /* The MISR1 and MISR2 registers are holding the interrupt status in
> > > @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct 
> > > phy_device *phydev)
> > >           return IRQ_NONE;
> > >   }
> > >   if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8))
> > > -         goto trigger_machine;
> > > +         trigger_machine = true;
> > >  
> > >   irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83822_MISR2);
> > >   if (irq_status < 0) {
> > > @@ -313,11 +314,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct 
> > > phy_device *phydev)
> > >           return IRQ_NONE;
> > >   }
> > >   if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8))
> > > -         goto trigger_machine;
> > > +         trigger_machine = true;
> > >  
> > > - return IRQ_NONE;
> > > + if (!trigger_machine)
> > > +         return IRQ_NONE;
> > >  
> > > -trigger_machine:
> > >   phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
> > >  
> > >   return IRQ_HANDLED;  
> > 
> > Would it be better to code it up as:
> > 
> >     irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> > 
> >     if (irq_status & ...)
> >             ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > 
> >     /* .. */
> > 
> >     if (ret != IRQ_NONE)
> >             phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
> > 
> >     return ret;
> > 
> > That reads a tiny bit better to me, but it's probably majorly
> > subjective so I'm happy with existing patch if you prefer it.  
> 
> I think I prefer it as it is and this is because it would be in line
> with all the other PHY drivers which do this:
> 
>       if (!(irq_status & int_enabled))
>               return IRQ_NONE;
> 
>       phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
> 

Okay, applied, thanks!

Reply via email to