On 01.03.2021 18:21:42, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > > @@ -730,7 +728,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> > > while ((idx = ffs(pend))) {
> > > idx--;
> > > pend &= ~(1 << idx);
> > > - obj = idx + C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_FIRST;
> > > + obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
> > > c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_TX, obj);
> > > can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
> > > bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
> > > @@ -740,7 +738,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
> > > /* Clear the bits in the tx_active mask */
> > > atomic_sub(clr, &priv->tx_active);
> > >
> > > - if (clr & (1 << (C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_TX_NUM - 1)))
> > > + if (clr & (1 << (priv->msg_obj_tx_num - 1)))
> >
> > Do we need 1UL here, too?
>
> Do you agree if I use the BIT macro ?No, please use GENMASK(priv->msg_obj_tx_num, 0) here. regrads, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
