On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:29:09PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:02:36PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > For route offload you get a dump of all the existing routes when you
> > > register your notifier. It's a bit different with bridge because you
> > > don't care about existing bridges when you just initialize your driver.
> > >
> > > We had a similar issue with VXLAN because its FDB can be populated and
> > > only then attached to a bridge that you offload. Check
> > > vxlan_fdb_replay(). Probably need to introduce something similar for
> > > FDB/MDB entries.
> >
> > So you would be in favor of a driver-voluntary 'pull' type of approach
> > at bridge join, instead of the bridge 'pushing' the addresses?
> >
> > That's all fine, except when we'll have more than 3 switchdev drivers,
> > how do we expect to manage all this complexity duplicated in many places
> > in the kernel, instead of having it in a central place? Are there corner
> > cases I'm missing which make the 'push' approach impractical?
>
> Not sure. It needs to be scheduled when the driver is ready to handle
> it. In br_add_if() after netdev_master_upper_dev_link() is probably a
> good place.
>
> It also needs to be done once and not every time another port joins the
> bridge. This can be done using the port's parent ID, similar to what we
> are already doing with the offload forward mark in
> nbp_switchdev_mark_set().
>
> But I'm not sure how we replay it only for a single notifier block. I'm
> not familiar with setups where you have more than one listener let alone
> more than one that is interested in notifications from a specific
> bridge, so maybe it is OK to just replay it for all the listeners. But I
> would prefer to avoid it if we can.

At least with a driver-initiated pull, this seems to work:

-----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------
>From 13cb5ccbe35f64cfabe7dea3f76c8bc778cff9dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 21:45:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] net: bridge: add a function that replays port and host-joined
 mdb entries

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com>
---
 include/linux/if_bridge.h |   3 +
 include/net/switchdev.h   |   1 +
 net/bridge/br_mdb.c       | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/dsa/slave.c           |   1 +
 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
index b979005ea39c..d1190e2984bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ static inline bool br_multicast_router(const struct 
net_device *dev)
 }
 #endif
 
+int br_mdb_replay(struct net_device *br_dev, struct net_device *dev,
+                 struct notifier_block *nb);
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING)
 bool br_vlan_enabled(const struct net_device *dev);
 int br_vlan_get_pvid(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_pvid);
diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
index b7fc7d0f54e2..8c3218177136 100644
--- a/include/net/switchdev.h
+++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ enum switchdev_obj_id {
 };
 
 struct switchdev_obj {
+       struct list_head list;
        struct net_device *orig_dev;
        enum switchdev_obj_id id;
        u32 flags;
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
index 8846c5bcd075..72978c881e11 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
@@ -235,6 +235,121 @@ static int __mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
        return -EMSGSIZE;
 }
 
+static int br_mdb_replay_one(struct notifier_block *nb, struct net_device *dev,
+                            struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb)
+{
+       struct switchdev_notifier_port_obj_info obj_info = {
+               .info = {
+                       .dev = dev,
+               },
+               .obj = &mdb->obj,
+       };
+       int err;
+
+       err = nb->notifier_call(nb, SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD, &obj_info);
+       return notifier_to_errno(err);
+}
+
+static int br_mdb_queue_one(struct list_head *mdb_list,
+                           enum switchdev_obj_id id,
+                           struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
+                           struct net_device *orig_dev)
+{
+       struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb;
+
+       mdb = kzalloc(sizeof(*mdb), GFP_ATOMIC);
+       if (!mdb)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       mdb->obj.id = id;
+       mdb->obj.orig_dev = orig_dev;
+       mdb->vid = mp->addr.vid;
+
+       if (mp->addr.proto == htons(ETH_P_IP))
+               ip_eth_mc_map(mp->addr.dst.ip4, mdb->addr);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+       else
+               ipv6_eth_mc_map(&mp->addr.dst.ip6, mdb->addr);
+#endif
+
+       list_add_tail(&mdb->obj.list, mdb_list);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+int br_mdb_replay(struct net_device *br_dev, struct net_device *dev,
+                 struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+       struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp;
+       struct switchdev_obj *obj, *tmp;
+       struct list_head mdb_list;
+       struct net_bridge *br;
+       int err = 0;
+
+       ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mdb_list);
+
+       if (!netif_is_bridge_master(br_dev))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (!netif_is_bridge_port(dev))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       br = netdev_priv(br_dev);
+
+       if (!br_opt_get(br, BROPT_MULTICAST_ENABLED))
+               return 0;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+
+       hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mp, &br->mdb_list, mdb_node) {
+               struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
+               struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
+
+               if (mp->host_joined) {
+                       err = br_mdb_queue_one(&mdb_list,
+                                              SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB,
+                                              mp, br_dev);
+                       if (err) {
+                               rcu_read_unlock();
+                               goto out_free_mdb;
+                       }
+               }
+
+               for (pp = &mp->ports; (p = rcu_dereference(*pp)) != NULL;
+                    pp = &p->next) {
+                       if (p->key.port->dev != dev)
+                               continue;
+
+                       err = br_mdb_queue_one(&mdb_list,
+                                              SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB,
+                                              mp, dev);
+                       if (err) {
+                               rcu_read_unlock();
+                               goto out_free_mdb;
+                       }
+               }
+       }
+
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+
+       list_for_each_entry(obj, &mdb_list, list) {
+               err = br_mdb_replay_one(nb, dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
+               if (err)
+                       goto out_free_mdb;
+       }
+
+out_free_mdb:
+       list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, tmp, &mdb_list, list) {
+               list_del(&obj->list);
+               kfree(SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
+       }
+
+       return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_mdb_replay);
+
 static int br_mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
                            struct net_device *dev)
 {
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 43e403ac70d5..9052ff5efab7 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -2070,6 +2070,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_changeupper(struct net_device *dev,
                        err = dsa_port_bridge_join(dp, info->upper_dev);
                        if (!err)
                                dsa_bridge_mtu_normalization(dp);
+                       err = br_mdb_replay(info->upper_dev, dev, 
&dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_notifier);
                        err = notifier_from_errno(err);
                } else {
                        dsa_port_bridge_leave(dp, info->upper_dev);
-- 
2.25.1

-----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------

I am just not sure why I need to emit the notification only once per
ASIC. Currently, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB is emitted for all bridge
ports, so the callers need to reference-count it anyway. As for the port
mdb entries, I am filtering the entries towards just a single port when
that joins. So I think this is okay.

Reply via email to