On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:25 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> The icmp{,v6}_send functions make all sorts of use of skb->cb, casting
> it with IPCB or IP6CB, assuming the skb to have come directly from the
> inet layer. But when the packet comes from the ndo layer, especially
> when forwarded, there's no telling what might be in skb->cb at that
> point. As a result, the icmp sending code risks reading bogus memory
> contents, which can result in nasty stack overflows such as this one
> reported by a user:
>
>     panic+0x108/0x2ea
>     __stack_chk_fail+0x14/0x20
>     __icmp_send+0x5bd/0x5c0
>     icmp_ndo_send+0x148/0x160
>
> In icmp_send, skb->cb is cast with IPCB and an ip_options struct is read
> from it. The optlen parameter there is of particular note, as it can
> induce writes beyond bounds. There are quite a few ways that can happen
> in __ip_options_echo. For example:
>
>     // sptr/skb are attacker-controlled skb bytes
>     sptr = skb_network_header(skb);
>     // dptr/dopt points to stack memory allocated by __icmp_send
>     dptr = dopt->__data;
>     // sopt is the corrupt skb->cb in question
>     if (sopt->rr) {
>         optlen  = sptr[sopt->rr+1]; // corrupt skb->cb + skb->data
>         soffset = sptr[sopt->rr+2]; // corrupt skb->cb + skb->data
>         // this now writes potentially attacker-controlled data, over
>         // flowing the stack:
>         memcpy(dptr, sptr+sopt->rr, optlen);
>     }
>
> In the icmpv6_send case, the story is similar, but not as dire, as only
> IP6CB(skb)->iif and IP6CB(skb)->dsthao are used. The dsthao case is
> worse than the iif case, but it is passed to ipv6_find_tlv, which does
> a bit of bounds checking on the value.
>
> This is easy to simulate by doing a `memset(skb->cb, 0x41,
> sizeof(skb->cb));` before calling icmp{,v6}_ndo_send, and it's only by
> good fortune and the rarity of icmp sending from that context that we've
> avoided reports like this until now. For example, in KASAN:
>
>     BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0
>     Write of size 38 at addr ffff888006f1f80e by task ping/89
>     CPU: 2 PID: 89 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-debug+ #5
>     Call Trace:
>      dump_stack+0x9a/0xcc
>      print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x160
>      __kasan_report.cold+0x20/0x38
>      kasan_report+0x32/0x40
>      check_memory_region+0x145/0x1a0
>      memcpy+0x39/0x60
>      __ip_options_echo+0xa0e/0x12b0
>      __icmp_send+0x744/0x1700
>
> Actually, out of the 4 drivers that do this, only gtp zeroed the cb for
> the v4 case, while the rest did not. So this commit actually removes the
> gtp-specific zeroing, while putting the code where it belongs in the
> shared infrastructure of icmp{,v6}_ndo_send.
>
> This commit fixes the issue by passing an empty IPCB or IP6CB along to
> the functions that actually do the work. For the icmp_send, this was
> already trivial, thanks to __icmp_send providing the plumbing function.
> For icmpv6_send, this required a tiny bit of refactoring to make it
> behave like the v4 case, after which it was straight forward.
>
> Fixes: a2b78e9b2cac ("sunvnet: generate ICMP PTMUD messages for smaller port 
> MTUs")
> Reported-by: SinYu <liux...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
> Cc: David L Stevens <david.stev...@oracle.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yd-lof116ahub6rme8vb8zpnrrnotdqhobex+bvoa8as...@mail.gmail.com/T/
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>

Thanks adding more context, Jason.

Reply via email to