Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
> 
> Currently TCP_SKB_CB() is hard-coded in skmsg code, it certainly
> does not work for any other non-TCP protocols. We can move them to
> skb ext, but it introduces a memory allocation on fast path.
> 
> Fortunately, we only need to a word-size to store all the information,
> because the flags actually only contains 1 bit so can be just packed
> into the lowest bit of the "pointer", which is stored as unsigned
> long.
> 
> Inside struct sk_buff, '_skb_refdst' can be reused because skb dst is
> no longer needed after ->sk_data_ready() so we can just drop it.
> 
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <ja...@cloudflare.com>
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <l...@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
> ---

Great, its likely we have more space in sk_buff we can use if needed
as well. queue_mapping, skb_iif, vlan*, fields come to mind. Couple
comments inline, but looks good to me.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>

[...]

> --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> @@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ static int sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(struct sk_psock 
> *psock, struct sk_buff *skb
>  static int sk_psock_handle_skb(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
>                              u32 off, u32 len, bool ingress)
>  {
> +     skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
> +
>       if (!ingress) {
>               if (!sock_writeable(psock->sk))
>                       return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -525,7 +527,7 @@ static void sk_psock_backlog(struct work_struct *work)
>               len = skb->len;
>               off = 0;
>  start:
> -             ingress = tcp_skb_bpf_ingress(skb);
> +             ingress = skb_bpf_ingress(skb);
>               do {
>                       ret = -EIO;
>                       if (likely(psock->sk->sk_socket))
> @@ -631,7 +633,12 @@ void __sk_psock_purge_ingress_msg(struct sk_psock *psock)
>  
>  static void sk_psock_zap_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock)
>  {
> -     __skb_queue_purge(&psock->ingress_skb);
> +     struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +     while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&psock->ingress_skb)) != NULL) {
> +             skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
> +             kfree_skb(skb);
> +     }
>       __sk_psock_purge_ingress_msg(psock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -752,7 +759,7 @@ static void sk_psock_skb_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
>       struct sk_psock *psock_other;
>       struct sock *sk_other;
>  
> -     sk_other = tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb);
> +     sk_other = skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb);
>       /* This error is a buggy BPF program, it returned a redirect
>        * return code, but then didn't set a redirect interface.
>        */
> @@ -802,9 +809,10 @@ int sk_psock_tls_strp_read(struct sk_psock *psock, 
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>                * TLS context.
>                */
>               skb->sk = psock->sk;
> -             tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
> +             skb_dst_drop(skb);
> +             skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);

Do we really need the skb_dst_drop() I thought we would have already dropped 
this here
but I've not had time to check yet.

>               ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
> -             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
> +             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
>               skb->sk = NULL;
>       }
>       sk_psock_tls_verdict_apply(skb, psock->sk, ret);
> @@ -816,7 +824,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_psock_tls_strp_read);
>  static void sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock,
>                                  struct sk_buff *skb, int verdict)
>  {
> -     struct tcp_skb_cb *tcp;
>       struct sock *sk_other;
>       int err = -EIO;
>  
> @@ -828,8 +835,7 @@ static void sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct sk_psock *psock,
>                       goto out_free;
>               }
>  
> -             tcp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
> -             tcp->bpf.flags |= BPF_F_INGRESS;
> +             skb_bpf_set_ingress(skb);
>  
>               /* If the queue is empty then we can submit directly
>                * into the msg queue. If its not empty we have to
> @@ -890,9 +896,10 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_read(struct strparser *strp, 
> struct sk_buff *skb)
>       skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
>       prog = READ_ONCE(psock->progs.skb_verdict);
>       if (likely(prog)) {
> -             tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
> +             skb_dst_drop(skb);

Same here.

> +             skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
>               ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
> -             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
> +             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
>       }
>       sk_psock_verdict_apply(psock, skb, ret);
>  out:
> @@ -1005,9 +1012,10 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_recv(read_descriptor_t 
> *desc, struct sk_buff *skb,
>       skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
>       prog = READ_ONCE(psock->progs.skb_verdict);
>       if (likely(prog)) {
> -             tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
> +             skb_dst_drop(skb);

And here. 

> +             skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
>               ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
> -             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, tcp_skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
> +             ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
>       }
>       sk_psock_verdict_apply(psock, skb, ret);

Thanks for doing this.

Reply via email to