On Wed, 2007-30-05 at 18:23 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I think exposing SFQ's queues as classes is a good thing, it allows > you to do whatever classification you want. In fact I'm probably > going to add patch on top to also dump them to userspace.
Yes, that would be useful. > What > remains for SFQ to do is serve the queues evenly. And it does (yes, I looked at the patch;->). > My classifier seperates them entirely. The only thing it keeps > in SFQ is the old classifier for compatibility, besides that its > exactly what you say. It should be easily possible to remove it > entirely and use my classifier in a compatible configuration > automatically. > If you removed it entirely (and had it as a separate classifier) IMO that would be a better approach. Then what you have is a pure FQ qdisc. In which case, you leave alone SFQ and have a new qdisc. The "removed" hashing dynamic classifier would of course be better off it allowed the user to select a hash algorithm such as the other ones specified in ESFQ. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
