samirweng1979 <[email protected]> wrote: > From: wengjianfeng <[email protected]> > > -ENOMEM has been used as a return value,it is not necessary to > assign it, and if kzalloc fail,not need free it,so just return > -ENOMEM when kzalloc fail. > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <[email protected]>
You sent the previous version just five days ago: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/ We maintainers are busy and usually takes some time to review the patch. So please avoid resending patches in such short intervals. Patch set to Superseded. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
