On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:23PM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> @@ -289,23 +286,12 @@ static void send_hsr_supervision_frame(struct hsr_port 
> *master,
>               hsr->announce_count++;
>       }
>  
> -     if (!hsr->prot_version)
> -             proto = ETH_P_PRP;
> -     else
> -             proto = ETH_P_HSR;
> -
> -     skb = hsr_init_skb(master, proto);
> +     skb = hsr_init_skb(master, ETH_P_PRP);
>       if (!skb) {
>               WARN_ONCE(1, "HSR: Could not send supervision frame\n");
>               return;
>       }

I wonder why you aren't even more aggressive, just remove the proto
argument from hsr_init_skb and delay setting skb->protocol to
hsr_fill_tag or the whereabouts. This is probably also more correct
since as far as I can see, nobody is updating the skb->proto of
supervision frames from HSR v0 to v1 after your change.

Reply via email to