On Thu, 2007-24-05 at 05:41 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > jamal wrote: > > + if (unlikely (ret != NETDEV_TX_BUSY && net_ratelimit())) > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG " BUG %s code %d qlen %d\n",dev->name, ret, > > q->q.qlen); > > > This seems to be based on an old version, your latest patch > changed this to KERN_WARNING.
sigh. I wont be able to do this change until tonight or tommorow morning. I think the process i am using to re-generate patches maybe too consuming? Maybe you could offer some advice. Heres what i do: 1. clone Daves latest tree localy 2. clone another tree from that 3. create patch on second clone 4. compile; test;compile;test until looks reasonable 5. commit with the comments 6. submit 7. build other patches on top (example batching in this case) 8. feedback on patch comes back 9. Re-do steps #2-#6 My steps #2-#6 are expensive; is there a way to optimize that process? cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
