From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:15:21 +0300 (EEST)
> The conservative spurious RTO response did not queue CWR even > though the sending rate was lowered. Whenever reduction happens > regardless of reason, CWR should be sent (forgetting to send it > is not very fatal though). > > A better approach would be to queue CWR when one of the sending > rate reducing responses (rate-halving one or this conservative > response) is used already at RTO. Doing that would allow CWR to > be sent along with the two new data segments that are sent > during FRTO. However, it's a bit "racy" because userland could > tune the response sysctl to a more aggressive one in between. > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Ilpo. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
