On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:55:45PM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 1/22/21 9:07 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:41:48 -0800 Arjun Roy wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h > >> index 768e93bd5b51..b216270105af 100644 > >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h > >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h > >> @@ -353,5 +353,9 @@ struct tcp_zerocopy_receive { > >> __u64 copybuf_address; /* in: copybuf address (small reads) */ > >> __s32 copybuf_len; /* in/out: copybuf bytes avail/used or error */ > >> __u32 flags; /* in: flags */ > >> + __u64 msg_control; /* ancillary data */ > >> + __u64 msg_controllen; > >> + __u32 msg_flags; > >> + /* __u32 hole; Next we must add >1 u32 otherwise length checks fail. */ > > > > Well, let's hope nobody steps on this landmine.. :) > > > > Past suggestions were made to use anonymous declarations - e.g., __u32 > :32; - as a way of reserving the space for future use. That or declare > '__u32 resvd', check that it must be 0 and makes it available for later > (either directly or with a union).
This is the schema (reserved field without union) used by the RDMA UAPIs from the beginning (>20 years already) and it works like a charm. Highly recommend :). Thanks >