David Acker wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
David Acker wrote:
David Acker wrote:
Done. Below is a patch against 2.6.22-rc1. It combines removing the
s-bit patch and applying the patch I previously sent.
Oops. I missed one state in that patch. Since the el-bit buffer will
normally not complete due to a zero size, we need to check if the
buffer with no data has the el-bit set. Without this, you have to
wait for the interrupt. Sorry about that...this was in the code I
tested on my embedded system but got lost in the regular kernel patch.
OK. Thanks.
If you don't mind I'm going to have some testing on this patch done for
a bit now (mostly x86 hardware of course) to see if there's no pitfalls
in it. It'll be a few days because of the weekend before I get back on it.
Cool. I will see if I can get some more tests running over the weekend on our PXA255
platform.
First impression just came in: It seems RX performance is dropped to 10mbit. TX
is unaffected and runs at 94mbit/tcp, but RX the new code seems to misbehave and
fluctuate, dropping below 10mbit after a few netperf runs and staying there...
ideas?
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
