Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> [Wed, 2021-01-20 18:09 -0800]:
> At the moment, BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_BIND hooks can rewrite user_port
> to the privileged ones (< ip_unprivileged_port_start), but it will
> be rejected later on in the __inet_bind or __inet6_bind.
>
> Let's export 'port_changed' event from the BPF program and bypass
> ip_unprivileged_port_start range check when we've seen that
> the program explicitly overrode the port. This is accomplished
> by generating instructions to set ctx->port_changed along with
> updating ctx->user_port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> ---
...
> @@ -244,17 +245,27 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map
> *map, void *key,
> if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(type)) { \
> lock_sock(sk); \
> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(sk, uaddr, type, \
> - t_ctx); \
> + t_ctx, NULL); \
> release_sock(sk); \
> } \
> __ret; \
> })
>
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr)
> \
> - BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK(sk, uaddr, BPF_CGROUP_INET4_BIND, NULL)
> -
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET6_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr)
> \
> - BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK(sk, uaddr, BPF_CGROUP_INET6_BIND, NULL)
> +#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr, type, flags) \
> +({ \
> + bool port_changed = false; \
I see the discussion with Martin in [0] on the program overriding the
port but setting exactly same value as it already contains. Commenting
on this patch since the code is here.
>From what I understand there is no use-case to support overriding the
port w/o changing the value to just bypass the capability. In this case
the code can be simplified.
Here instead of introducing port_changed you can just remember the
original ((struct sockaddr_in *)uaddr)->sin_port or
((struct sockaddr_in6 *)uaddr)->sin6_port (they have same offset/size so
it can be simplified same way as in sock_addr_convert_ctx_access() for
user_port) ...
> + int __ret = 0; \
> + if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(type)) { \
> + lock_sock(sk); \
> + __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(sk, uaddr, type, \
> + NULL, \
> + &port_changed); \
> + release_sock(sk); \
> + if (port_changed) \
... and then just compare the original and the new ports here.
The benefits will be:
* no need to introduce port_changed field in struct bpf_sock_addr_kern;
* no need to do change program instructions;
* no need to think about compiler optimizing out those instructions;
* no need to think about multiple programs coordination, the flag will
be set only if port has actually changed what is easy to reason about
from user perspective.
wdyt?
> + *flags |= BIND_NO_CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE; \
> + } \
> + __ret; \
> +})
>
> #define BPF_CGROUP_PRE_CONNECT_ENABLED(sk) \
> ((cgroup_bpf_enabled(BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT) || \
> @@ -453,8 +464,7 @@ static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct
> bpf_map *map,
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS(sk,skb) ({ 0; })
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_SOCK(sk) ({ 0; })
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_SOCK_RELEASE(sk) ({ 0; })
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr) ({ 0; })
> -#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET6_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr) ({ 0; })
> +#define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_BIND_LOCK(sk, uaddr, type, flags) ({ 0; })
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk) ({ 0; })
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET6_POST_BIND(sk) ({ 0; })
> #define BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_CONNECT(sk, uaddr) ({ 0; })
...
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210121223330.pyk4ljtjirm2zlay@kafai-mbp/
--
Andrey Ignatov
